{"id":6860,"date":"2017-04-23T14:36:42","date_gmt":"2017-04-23T14:36:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/?p=6860"},"modified":"2017-04-23T15:38:17","modified_gmt":"2017-04-23T15:38:17","slug":"will-tech-and-financials-struggle-here","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/?p=6860","title":{"rendered":"Will Tech and Financials Struggle Here?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>95 of the Sp 500 companies have reported Q1 &#8217;17 earnings as of Friday, April 21, &#8217;17 per Thomson Reuters I\/B\/E\/S. By the end of this coming week, April 28, &#8217;17, about half the SP 500 will have reported their first quarter results.<\/p>\n<p>The Financial sector is expected to grow earnings 19.9% and revenue 8% in Q1 &#8217;17, per Thomson&#8217;s &#8220;This Week in Earnings&#8221;, published Friday night, April 21 &#8217;17.<\/p>\n<p>Like much of the SP 500, that number looks good thanks to the weak compare against the Financial sector&#8217;s Q1 &#8217;16 earnings and revenue growth, where Financial sector earnings fell 10%, and revenue fell 1%.<\/p>\n<p>Thursday night, April 27th, the schedule calls for several large-cap Technology companies to report Q1 &#8217;17 earnings:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Amazon<\/li>\n<li>Microsoft<\/li>\n<li>Alphabet (still call it Google)<\/li>\n<li>Intel<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>While not a Technology company (per se), Starbucks, a Nasdaq 100 component, also reports after the bell Thursday night. (Long all companies mentioned in various weights.)<\/p>\n<p>Jeff Miller, <a href=\"https:\/\/seekingalpha.com\/article\/4064341-weighing-week-ahead-time-rebuild-wall-worry\">over at a Dash of Insight and Weighing the Week Ahead\u00a0<\/a>has a good headline for his excellent weekly summary. We probably need a a little &#8220;rebuilding&#8221; here.<\/p>\n<p>Technology as a sector is expected to grow Q1 &#8217;17 earnings and revenue +15.7% and 7.3% respectively versus -4% and -6% respectively in Q1 &#8217;16.<\/p>\n<p>In Bespoke&#8217;s weekly newsletter published every Friday night, Paul Hickey and his staff usually devote a few pages to discussing SP 500 earnings: the point this week is that both Technology and Financial sectors have positive &#8220;current revisions spread&#8221; and Technology&#8217;s spread is positive to the degree that &#8211; as Bespoke concluded &#8211; &#8220;the Technology sector typically has seen weaker returns when its revisions spread is positive heading into earnings season&#8221; versus the opposite.<\/p>\n<p>Its another way of saying expectations are high for this week&#8217;s Technology earnings reports so investors might want to prepare for a little weakness.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Analysis \/ conclusion: <\/strong><\/em>With a hat tip to Bespoke, weak compare&#8217;s versus last year and high expectations into Technology earnings should cause readers to be a little cautious and careful. However, the earnings game is a long game, and thus I dont expect to make any changes to sector weights or positions. Microsoft (MSFT) remains clients number one position and that&#8217;s been the case for several years, since ValueAct took a position in the stock in April, 2013. (ValueAct has undoutedly trimmed some of that Microsoft position since 2013.) Microsoft is a GARP (growth-at-a-reasonable-price) stock, with the added positive that in 2016, Microsoft cleared it&#8217;s early 2000 all-time-highs during the peak of the Technology and large-cap growth bubbles of $51, $52, $53 per share. (Some technicians saw a $58 print for Microsoft at some point in the late 1990&#8217;s, early 2000 but it doesn&#8217;t show up on Worden TC2000, which is my technical software. Other technicians were asked to confirm Microsoft&#8217;s all-time-high from that time period, and all tell me, $52 &#8211; $53.)<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft could get the added benefit of a resurgent PC sector this quarter and the software giant is also a beneficiary of any cash repatriation plan out of Congress, should that ever happen.<\/p>\n<p>However my own expectations seem too exuberant, so today&#8217;s summary will end there.<\/p>\n<p>Top two sector overweight&#8217;s remain Technology and Financial&#8217;s and the top two client holdings remain Microsoft and Schwab, and have been that way for years. Positions and weighting can change at any time.<\/p>\n<p>Energy&#8217;s weighting was reduced on Friday OIH was sold), to what is probably now a &#8220;market weight&#8221; at 7% or so, but with Emerging Market&#8217;s and Brazil ETF&#8217;s (EEM, VWO, EWZ), which are markets closely tied to Energy, I still feel like client&#8217;s have an indirect overweight to the sector.<\/p>\n<p>Thanks for reading.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>95 of the Sp 500 companies have reported Q1 &#8217;17 earnings as of Friday, April 21, &#8217;17 per Thomson Reuters&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[68,173,102,171,95,84,53,55,133,123,174],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-eem","category-emerging-market-etfs-eem","category-emerging-markets","category-energy-etfs-xle","category-energy-sector","category-financial-sector","category-financials","category-msft","category-oil-services-cos","category-technology","category-vwo"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6860","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6860"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6860\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6870,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6860\/revisions\/6870"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}