{"id":4828,"date":"2015-05-13T23:23:18","date_gmt":"2015-05-13T23:23:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/?p=4828"},"modified":"2015-05-13T23:23:18","modified_gmt":"2015-05-13T23:23:18","slug":"looking-at-the-sp-500s-valuation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/?p=4828","title":{"rendered":"Looking at the SP 500&#8217;s Valuation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A better title for tonight&#8217;s post might be &#8220;What is the True Growth Rate of Q1 &#8217;15 SP 500 Earnings ?&#8221; since so many look the SP 500&#8217;s p.e ratio and draw conclusions from that metric.<\/p>\n<p>I asked Greg Harrison, the Thomson Reuters earnings data guru, what the Q1 &#8217;15 SP 500 earnings growth rate is, ex-Energy, and ex-Apple. Here is what Greg sent Trinity in response to the question:<\/p>\n<p>Overall: 2.1%<\/p>\n<p>Ex-AAPL: 0.6%<\/p>\n<p>Ex-Energy: 10.2%<\/p>\n<p>Ex-AAPL &amp; Energy: 8.8%<\/p>\n<p>* Source: Thomson Reuters, 5\/13\/15<\/p>\n<p>If you review the <a href=\"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/?p=4816\">last<\/a> Weekly Earnings Update, from this weekend, you can see how the overall growth rate distorts the PEG (the P.E-to-Growth rate) ratio, but looking at the SP 500, either on an ex-Apple or Ex-Energy growth rate, the 17.5(x) p.e ratio on the SP 500 doesn&#8217;t look too salty, since ex-Energy the SP 500 is trading at 1.7(x) its current growth rate, and &#8220;ex&#8221; both Energy and AAPL, on a PEG basis, the SP 500 looks fairly valued at 2(x) PEG. (Trinity is long AAPL and some Energy exposure for clients.)<\/p>\n<p>Frankly, when Greg sent me the data on Wednesday, May 13th, I was surprised that &#8220;ex-Energy&#8221; the Q1 &#8217;15 SP 500 earnings growth rate was +10.2%.<\/p>\n<p>At 3\/31\/15, the SP 500 was trading at about 10(x) cash-flow per JP Morgan&#8217;s Guide to the Market.<\/p>\n<p>The one valuation tool that has always intrigued me was the &#8220;capitalized earnings&#8221; model, which Brian Wesbury, the First Trust economist has written about through the years.<\/p>\n<p>Using the current &#8220;forward 4-quarter estimate&#8221; of $122.17 found on the Weekly Earnings Update, and dividing it by the current 10-year Treasury yield of 2.25%, &#8220;fair value&#8221; for the SP 500 is \u00a0roughly 5,400, with the SP 500 currently 60% undervalued. Undoubtedly some find that preposterous, so let&#8217;s use the current yield on the iShares, iBoxx Investment Grade Bond ETF of 3.35%, would still leave the SP 500 40% undervalued. ( I chose the LQD versus the AGG given the higher current yield.)<\/p>\n<p>The point is if we &#8220;solve&#8221; for the investment grade bond yield that would find for today&#8217;s 2,100 close on the SP 500 would be 5.82%.<\/p>\n<p>Investment grade credit spreads could rise by 247 bp&#8217;s (theoretically), with no change in the forward earnings estimate, and it would only mean that the SP 500 find today&#8217;s &#8220;theoretical fair value&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Conclusion \/ summary:<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0 My own conclusion is that when the 35 year bull market in Treasuries ends, it will be very painful. I can only wonder how many are chasing yield in the short end of the yield and credit curves, trying to make nickles. For reasons cited <a href=\"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/?p=4719\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/?p=3802\">here<\/a>, I have clients positioned &#8211; in the event of a bond market rout &#8211; that stocks will decline in value, it is just that the decline should be short-lived and not as bad as the ultimate decline in Treasury and investment grade bond prices.<\/p>\n<p>We are seeing a decent increase in rates not only in the US but in Germany and across Europe, the last 5 weeks. \u00a0is this another head fake or will there be a genuine bear market in bond prices this time ?<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ll know shortly.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A better title for tonight&#8217;s post might be &#8220;What is the True Growth Rate of Q1 &#8217;15 SP 500 Earnings&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[90,50,95,9,153],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apple-aapl","category-bond-markets","category-energy-sector","category-sp-500","category-sp-500-valuation"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4828","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4828"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4828\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4838,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4828\/revisions\/4838"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}