{"id":2789,"date":"2013-11-03T08:43:02","date_gmt":"2013-11-03T08:43:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/?p=2789"},"modified":"2013-11-03T08:43:02","modified_gmt":"2013-11-03T08:43:02","slug":"11-2-13-sp-500-earnings-update-q4-13-earnings-growth-will-be-the-strongest-in-2-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/?p=2789","title":{"rendered":"11.2.13: SP 500 Earnings Update: Q4 &#8217;13 Earnings Growth will be the Strongest in 2 Years"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Per ThomsonReuters, the &#8220;forward 4-quarter&#8221; estimate on the SP 500 slipped $0.30 last week to $118.24 from $118.54 the week prior.<\/p>\n<p>The p.e ratio on the forward estimate is now 14.8(x), slightly above the 10-year average p.e ratio of 14(x) per Factset.<\/p>\n<p>The &#8220;earnings yield&#8221; on the SP 500 (the $118.24 forward estimate divided by the closing value for the SP 500 on 11\/1\/13) is 6.72%.<\/p>\n<p>Importantly, the growth rate on the forward estimate rose to 6.93%, up from last week&#8217;s 6.66% and the prior week&#8217;s 6.19%.<\/p>\n<p>Just on a PEG (p.e to growth ratio) basis, the SP 500 is trading at 2.15(x) PEG as of 11\/1\/13, which is inline with 2013&#8217;s weekly historical PEG ratio. The high PEG this calendar year was 3.71(x) in early May, 2013, and the low PEG was 1.97(x) in mid-August, 2013.<\/p>\n<p>We received an email this week from Dale L. of Chestmoor Capital. Dale noted that the usually steady erosion in the quarterly growth estimate for Q4 &#8217;13, has not occurred to the extent that it did in Q1 and Q2 &#8217;13. This was a keen observation, and was part and parcel to our comment about the Q3 &#8217;13 earnings growth estimate ending September at +4.6%, (when the\u00a0y\/y percentage growth number for quarters 1 &amp; 2, were closer to 1% &#8211; 2% as the numbers started to get reported).<\/p>\n<p>Factset does a great job of quantifying this phenomenon: from Factset&#8217;s Earnings Insight report dated November 1 &#8217;13, &#8220;During the month of October &#8217;13,&#8230;the Q4 bottoms-up EPS estimate dropped 1.5% during the month of October.&#8221; Factset goes on to explain that when compared to the trailing 1-year, 5-year and 10-year averages, this 1.5% drop was less than those various averages, with the point being that we are seeing less pressure on the 4th quarter estimate than is normally seen after one month.<\/p>\n<p>T\/R is looking for +9.2% y\/y earnings growth in Q4 &#8217;13, while Factset is expecting 7.2%. When all is said and done by mid-February of &#8217;14, I expect the T\/R growth rate to be above 10% for q4 &#8217;13.<\/p>\n<p>Again, this was an astute observation by Dale. What it means\u00a0is there is less pressure on forward estimates\u00a0in terms of percentage growth (as confirmed from Factset), even though analysts as a group remain conservative in terms of\u00a0modeling forward\u00a0quarters.<\/p>\n<p>To summarize all this (in English), while we may not be seeing upward revisions to near-term q4 &#8217;13 estimates and beyond, what we are seeing is less downward pressure on the estimates. Analysts are getting less negative or cautious.<\/p>\n<p>Meaningful ? Personally, I think it is another small positive around the SP 500 earnings story. The fact that the forward growth rate is moving higher is another plus too.<\/p>\n<p>Still, the SP 500 needs a 2% &#8211; 3% flush to work off its overbought state.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Q3 &#8217;13 Earnings results &#8211; any surprises ?<\/strong> <\/em><\/p>\n<p>Per ThomsonReuters, y\/y earnings growth for the SP 500 is +4.2% as of November 1, &#8217;13, inline with the +4.6% projected on October 1. Excluding JP Morgan&#8217;s legal charge, which has had the largest impact on both the SP 500 and the Financial sector as a whole,\u00a0earnings growth is +6.9% per Thomson for the SP 500, and the Financial sector earnings growth is closer to 15%.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the change in earnings growth expectations\u00a0since October 1 (first column is November 1, 2nd column is as of October 1):<\/p>\n<p>Consumer Discretionary: +10.1%, +7.5%<\/p>\n<p>Consumer Staples: +5.2%, +4.9%<\/p>\n<p>Energy: -7.9%, and -0.7%<\/p>\n<p>Financials: +16%, +9.4% (excludes JPM charge)<\/p>\n<p>Healthcare: +7.7%, +3.6%<\/p>\n<p>Industrials: +7.5% and +5.2%<\/p>\n<p>Materials: +4.6% and -0.3%<\/p>\n<p>Technology: +8.4% and +3.3% (Per Factset, ex-Apple&#8217;s drag on the sector, Tech would be +12% as of Nov 1)<\/p>\n<p>Telco: +8.5%, +7.6%<\/p>\n<p>Utilities: +1.9%, +0.8%<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>SP 500: +6.9%, +4.6%<\/strong> <\/em><\/p>\n<p>We have to be careful not to mix and match estimates between ThomsonReuters (T\/R) and Factset. Factset&#8217;s estimates tend to be lower than Thomson&#8217;s, on a percentage basis. To be fair, Factset does a better job of clarifying one-time events and providing readers with color around the numbers, as opposed to Thomson&#8217;s more direct data.<\/p>\n<p>Revenue growth (per T\/R) is +3.3% for q3 &#8217;13, a little stronger than expected as of October 1, but still low single digits. Very little has changed in that regard.<\/p>\n<p>Basic Materials is looking very good in our opinion. Just like clockwork, as soon as Alcoa was dropped from the Dow Jones, it reported an 80% &#8220;upside&#8221; earnings surprise, a revenue beat, and the stock rose 17% in October &#8217;13 alone. Freeport (FCX) and US Steel (X) rose 11% and 20% during the month of October as well. Basic Materials is tied to global growth and that looks like it will get stronger in 2014. We are overweight Basic Mat in a number of client accounts. (Long all 3 names.)<\/p>\n<p>Energy is still not trading well. Basic Mat &#8211; at least the non-gold miners &#8211; bottomed in late June, early July, if you look at Alcoa, Freeport, US Steel, Cliff Natural Resources, etc. Exxon and Chevron reported this week, and although Exxon traded a little better following the Thursday morning earnings release, Chevron didn&#8217;t trade well after reporting on Friday. The stocks will start to trade better before the earnings estimates change. We remain underweight Energy.<\/p>\n<p>3 of our top 4 holdings remain Financials.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Conclusion:<\/strong><\/em> SP 500 earnings continue to be a &#8220;good but not great&#8221; story, certainly with growth far slower than we saw in the late 1990&#8217;s. But the reasonable\u00a0p.e ratio, and the SP 500 cash generation\u00a0is resulting in a lot of positives for corporate earnings. The next major upside\u00a0catalyst will have to come from revenue growth, but that could be a few years away. We still think, given the above commentary\u00a0that Q4 &#8217;13\u00a0could see 10% earnings growth for the SP 500, or the best quarter of earnings growth since early 2012. However that just means that 2013&#8217;s full year earnings growth will be just 6% &#8211; 7%, in line with the post WWII average of 7%. The SP 500 remains overbought &#8211; we are still looking for a good 3% &#8211; 5%\u00a0flush in the\u00a0benchmark. We also still like Financials, particularly JPM, Schwab, and GS. Goldman is recovering from its post-earnings drop, and doing so nicely.<\/p>\n<p>Trinity Asset Management, Inc. by:<\/p>\n<p>Brian Gilmartin, CFA<\/p>\n<p>Portfolio manager<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Per ThomsonReuters, the &#8220;forward 4-quarter&#8221; estimate on the SP 500 slipped $0.30 last week to $118.24 from $118.54 the week&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,90,3,79,84,53,60,27,9,36,1,78],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2789","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aa","category-apple-aapl","category-earnings","category-fcx","category-financial-sector","category-financials","category-gs","category-jpm","category-sp-500","category-schw","category-uncategorized","category-x"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2789","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2789"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2789\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2809,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2789\/revisions\/2809"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2789"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2789"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2789"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}