{"id":19959,"date":"2026-10-09T06:19:57","date_gmt":"2026-10-09T12:19:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/?p=19959"},"modified":"2026-10-09T06:19:57","modified_gmt":"2026-10-09T12:19:57","slug":"jpmorgan-citigroup-and-bank-of-america-earnings-previews-eventually-a-return-to-more-normal-growth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/?p=19959","title":{"rendered":"JPMorgan, Citigroup, and Bank of America Earnings Previews: Eventually a Return to More Normal Growth"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Both JPMorgan (JPM) and Citigroup (C) are scheduled to report their Q3 &#8217;26 financial results before the opening bell on Tuesday morning, October 13th, 2026.<\/p>\n<p>Bank of America (BAC) will report their q3 &#8217;26 before the opening bell, Wednesday morning, October 14th.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>JPMorgan (JPM):\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>When JPM reports their Q3 &#8217;26 financial results before the opening bell on Tuesday, October 13th, street consensus is expecting EPS of $5.90 and net revenue of $51.5 billion, for expected year-over-year (y-o-y) growth of 16% and 11%, respectively.<\/p>\n<p>Full-year &#8217;26 estimates are currently expecting that the banking giant will see 24% EPS growth and 15% net revenue growth.<\/p>\n<p>In Q2 &#8217;26, JPM net revenue grew 15% while EPS grew 24% yoy, primarily thanks to the equity market performance from April through June &#8217;26. Equity trading and equity-related revenue rose 86% in Q2 &#8217;26, up sharply from Q1 &#8217;26, which was just 17% at that time, so Q3 &#8217;26 will likely see a similar return to a more normal equity quarter. Fixed-income &#8211; at least the 2nd half of the quarter from mid-August &#8217;26 &#8211; should also see tempered revenue growth.<\/p>\n<p>JPM&#8217;s results by segment:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/JPMresultsbysegment10826.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-19960\" src=\"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/JPMresultsbysegment10826-300x258.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"258\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/JPMresultsbysegment10826-300x258.png 300w, https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/JPMresultsbysegment10826-150x129.png 150w, https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/JPMresultsbysegment10826.png 625w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Click on the above spreadsheet and look at Q2 &#8217;26&#8217;s results. JPM&#8217;s corporate and investment bank is where the capital markets group resides, so that will likely mean a peak in y-o-y growth for the segment all the way through Q2 &#8217;27. The Anthropic write-up, the SpaceX (SPCX) IPO and the overheated semiconductor market from May and June &#8217;26 all added to a verry strong quarter for the money-center banks, investments banks, and any market-related entity that generated any trading revenue.<\/p>\n<p>More under-the-surface, but still a very real contributor to earnings growth is that JPM has repurchased $30.1 billion in common stock from Q2 &#8217;26 back through Q3 &#8217;25. Since Q4 &#8217;24 through Q2 &#8217;26, JPM has repo&#8217;ed 7.5% of it&#8217;s common shares.<\/p>\n<p>As of 10\/8\/26,\u00a0 stock is down about 10% from it&#8217;s all-time-high of $366 and is now oversold on the daily chart. The selling has been pretty steady since mid-August, once it became obvious the FOMC was going to raise interest rates.<\/p>\n<p>JPM is trading at 13x expected 24% EPS growth in full-year &#8217;26, and then that EPS growth tempers to 0% in &#8217;27 and 8% in &#8217;28.<\/p>\n<p>Off all the big banks, JPM trades at the highest price-to-book multiple at 2.5x, but JPM has also generated the highest return-on-tangible common equity (ROTCE) in the low 20% range for the last 2 &#8211; 3 years.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Citigroup (C):<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>When Citigroup reports it&#8217;s Q3 &#8217;26 quarter on Tuesday morning, October 13th before the opening bell, analyst consensus expectation for EPS is $2.66 in EPS and $23.7 billion in revenue for expected EPS and net revenue growth of 43% and 7% respectively.<\/p>\n<p>Current full-year &#8217;26 EPS and revenue growth estimates are expecting 48% EPS growth and 13% revenue growth for the bank that is still trying to dig out of 2008 and then Covid in 2020.<\/p>\n<p>In the last 7 quarters, Citigroup has averaged 39% y-o-y EPS growth, which assumes the $2.66 is at least met for Q3 &#8217;26.<\/p>\n<p>In Q2 &#8217;26 Citi generated 14% net revenue growth and from that investor saw 61% EPS growth. Citi reported a 13% ROTCE, but then guided to 11% for the full-year so there was some confusion, but Citi benefitted from capital markets activity as did JPMorgan, which may not repeat the next 2 quarters.<\/p>\n<p>Like JPM, Citi repurchased $18.45 bl in common stock the last 4 quarters, and has reduced fully diluted shares outstanding by 10% since Q4 &#8217;23.<\/p>\n<p>Trading at just over 1x book value, Citi is more the value play of the two banking giants,\u00a0 but Citi has a much lower ROTCE than JPM&#8217;s. Citi is trading at just 11x expected 48% EPS growth in &#8217;26, while 15% EPS growth is still expected in &#8217;27 and &#8217;28.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Bank of America (BAC):<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Bank of America is scheduled to report their 3rd quarter, 2026, financial results before the opening bell on Wednesday October 14th, &#8217;26.<\/p>\n<p>Before the numbers are posted, the one aspect to BAC&#8217;s estimates for Q2 &#8217;26 and for calendar year estimates is that &#8211; of the three big banks &#8211; BAC is the only BAC to see lower estimates for Q3 &#8217;26 today, than following the 2nd quarter results.<\/p>\n<p>BAC says in the 10-q that they are asset-sensitive, but the bank trades like it&#8217;s liability-sensitive.<\/p>\n<p>For BAC, street consensus is expecting EPS of $1.19, on $31.3 billion of net revenue for expected y-o-y growth of 12% and 11% respectively. Those expected results are in-between JPM and C, while expected full-year BAC results are expecting 20% EPS growth on 12% net revenue growth.<\/p>\n<p>Like C and JPM, BAC&#8217;s equity trading grew 70% in Q2 &#8217;26, with a 50% boost in investment banking revenue.<\/p>\n<p>It was a GREAT quarter for BAC &#8211; aided substantially by capital markets &#8211; with ROTCE coming in at +17%.<\/p>\n<p>Today, BAC is trading at $54 per share, down from a high of $65, and is trading at 12x expected EPS this year of 20% growth, and 12% net revenue growth.<\/p>\n<p>The problem is the comp&#8217;s get tougher for the big giants, and BAC&#8217;s negative revisions, albeit slight revisions are different than JPM and Citi&#8217;s expected estimates.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Here&#8217;s a look at key metrics for each bank:<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Expected EPS growth:\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em><strong>JPM:<\/strong><\/em> 24% in &#8217;26, 0% in &#8217;27, 8% in &#8217;28<\/li>\n<li><em><strong>Citi:<\/strong><\/em> 48% in &#8217;26, 15% in &#8216;27%, 15% in &#8217;28<\/li>\n<li><em><strong>BAC:<\/strong> <\/em>20% in &#8217;26, 14% in &#8217;27, 12% in &#8217;28<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em><strong>Expected net revenue growth:\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em><strong>JPM:<\/strong><\/em> 15% in &#8217;26, 3% in &#8217;27, 5% in &#8217;28<\/li>\n<li><em><strong>Citi:<\/strong><\/em> 13% in &#8217;26, 3% in &#8216;27%, 5% in &#8217;28<\/li>\n<li><em><strong>BAC:<\/strong> 12<\/em>% in &#8217;26, 6% in &#8217;27, 5% in &#8217;28<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em><strong>Current PE ratio&#8217;s based on current estimates:<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em><strong>JPM: <\/strong><\/em>13x &#8217;26, 13x &#8217;27, 12% &#8217;28<\/li>\n<li><em><strong>Citi: <\/strong><\/em>11x &#8217;26, 10x &#8217;27, 9x &#8217;28<\/li>\n<li><em><strong>BAC: <\/strong><\/em>12x &#8217;26, 10x &#8217;27, 9x &#8217;28<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em><strong>ROTCE (avg):\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em><strong>JPM: <\/strong><\/em>20% &#8211; 21%<\/li>\n<li><em><strong>Citi: <\/strong><\/em>under 10% mainly, trying to improve it. &#8217;26 goal is low teens<\/li>\n<li><em><strong>Bac: <\/strong><\/em>mid-teens<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em><strong>Share repurchase dollars last 4 quarters:<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em><strong>JPM:<\/strong><\/em> $30.9 billion<\/li>\n<li><em><strong>Citi:<\/strong><\/em> $18.45 billion<\/li>\n<li><em><strong>Bac: <\/strong><\/em>$26.74 billion<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em><strong>Conclusion \/ summary: <\/strong><\/em>The banking system remains in as good of a financial condition as it&#8217;s been in, in the last 30 years. Capital is in good shape, and is being returned to shareholders via dividends and buybacks, credit remains in very good shape, on a macro level, as the US consumer remains in fairly good shape. Credit card delinquencies and charge-offs &#8211; at least for the banks above &#8211; show little deterioration thus far. The housing and mortgage business will likely be subdued given interest rates and now the +7% 30-year mortgage rate.<\/p>\n<p>With a 10-year Treasury yield at 5.30%, even if the FOMC raises the fed funds rate in December &#8217;26, assuming no change in the yield curve, there will still be a positive slope between the fed funds and 2-year Treasury, but maybe not to the extent that the it&#8217;s greatly accretive to earnings.<\/p>\n<p>Net interest income (NII) and net interest margin (NIM) could be a push for the big banks in late &#8217;26, and 2027.<\/p>\n<p>The substantial capital market trading and banking gains will likely moderate into early 2027, and the banks face very tough comp&#8217;s next year in the first half of &#8217;27.<\/p>\n<p>All this being said, expect bank EPS and revenue growth to moderate in coming quarters. The Anthropic IPO should it happen in November &#8217;26 will add to 2026 results, but it&#8217;s more the &#8217;27 results that will likely look more subdued.<\/p>\n<p>Technically, the three banks mentioned above are all &#8220;oversold&#8221; testing their 200-day moving averages, and could see a decent bounce after earnings are released.<\/p>\n<p>Citigroup is the best &#8220;value&#8221; play, given the low-but-improving ROTCE, and Jane Fraser&#8217;s continued efforts to pare unproductive assets and improve profitability. JPMorgan is the best bank (period) given Jamie Dimon&#8217;s efforts. Jamie has created an American financial juggernaut, and with JPM, investors get both capital markets exposure and a POBB (plain old banking business) in one. But JPM&#8217;s valuation remains at a premium given it&#8217;s leadership position, so it has the most to lose if the ideal industry conditions, turn south.<\/p>\n<p>Bank of America is interesting because Berkshire has been paring back the position, and it&#8217;s the least &#8220;momentum-y&#8221; of the old money centers. The size of the buyback surprised me. A bank like BAC could hold it&#8217;s value better in a market that punishes banks since it&#8217;s the most out-of-favor.<\/p>\n<p>JPM is this blog biggest position of the above-listed banks, with Citi and Bank of America following. Both JPM and C are in this blog&#8217;s Top 10 holdings as of September 30 &#8217;26.<\/p>\n<p>These banks are cheap on a PE-to-growth basis, and now testing their 200-day moving averages.<\/p>\n<p>None of this is advice or a recommendation but only an opinion. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All EPS and revenue estimates are sourced from LSEG, this blog&#8217;s sell-side estimate provider. None of this information may be updated and if updated, may not be done in a timely manner.<\/p>\n<p>Thanks for reading.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Both JPMorgan (JPM) and Citigroup (C) are scheduled to report their Q3 &#8217;26 financial results before the opening bell on&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[38,278,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19959","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bac","category-c","category-jpm"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19959","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19959"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19959\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19977,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19959\/revisions\/19977"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19959"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19959"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fundamentalis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19959"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}